The 2-Minute Rule for religious based asylum case laws usa
The 2-Minute Rule for religious based asylum case laws usa
Blog Article
nine . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair on the offender and also the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts but they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The an abundance of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
Additionally it is important to note that granting of seniority into a civil servant without the actual duration of service almost violates all the service structure like a civil servant inducted in Quality seventeen by claiming these types of benefit without any experience be directly posted in any higher grade, which is neither the intention in the regulation nor of your equity. Read more
Should the DIGP finds evidence of the cognizable offense by both party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and progress according on the regulation. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that could be consulted in deciding a current case. It could be used to guide the court, but is just not binding precedent.
184 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as set forth would not use, because the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, relatively he has become acquitted on the criminal charges based on evidence and it really is very well-settled regulation that once the civil servant is acquitted from the criminal case, then on this incredibly charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment by the department and held him disqualified for your post because acquittal for all long term purposes. The aforesaid proposition has become set at naught with the Supreme Court of Pakistan while in the case of your District Police Officer Mainwali and a couple of others v.
While there is not any prohibition against referring to case law from a state other than the state in which the case is being listened to, it holds very little sway. Still, if there isn't any precedent during the home state, relevant case legislation from another state may be regarded because of the court.
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically produce exoneration from departmental charges based about the same factual grounds. While a writ under Article 199 is out there in specific limited situations, it is generally not the suitable remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full chance to cross-examine witnesses and present his/her defense but did not persuade the department of his/her innocence.
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is actually a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents on the boy or girl will not approve of this kind of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they can do if they might Lower off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these kinds of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male who's a major, the couple is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who provides such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings via the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by legislation.
Some bodies are specified statutory powers to issue steerage with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, including the Highway Code.
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court might interfere with the conclusion or maybe the finding and mould the relief to really make it acceptable on the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified with the decision of your Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The police have the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a Court for cognizable offenses. The presence of this power casts an obligation within the police, and so they must bear in mind, as held by this Court from time to time in its several pronouncemnts, that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Primarily, the Police Officers are necessary to protect instead of abduct. Read more
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar dilemma. When they sue their landlord, the court must use the previous court’s decision in implementing the legislation. This get more info example of case law refers to 2 cases listened to during the state court, for the same level.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
Therefore, this petition is found for being not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), plus the petitioners may perhaps find remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more